Our Verdict –Taste of the Wild Vs. Blue Wilderness: Who Wins?
After carefully analyzing protein content, ingredient quality, and recall history, we lean towards Taste of the Wild as the superior choice. Both brands offer high-quality protein sources, but Taste of the Wild provides a slightly better range of options, including exotic meats that are rich in essential amino acids. Ingredient quality is comparable in both, but Taste of the Wild edges out with fewer plant-based protein concentrates. Regarding recall history, both brands have had incidents but have also taken steps to improve quality control. Overall, while both are strong contenders, Taste of the Wild has a slight edge in our evaluation.
Taste of the Wild vs. Blue Wilderness: Frequently Asked Questions
1. Which brand offers a wider variety of protein sources?
Both brands provide a diverse array of protein sources. Taste of the Wild emphasizes natural and exotic meats, such as buffalo and venison, while Blue Wilderness includes traditional meats like chicken and beef, as well as more unique options like alligators. It boils down to personal preference and your pet’s dietary needs.
2. Are both brands grain-free?
Yes, both Taste of the Wild and Blue Wilderness offer grain-free formulas. They use alternative carbohydrates like sweet potatoes and peas to ensure dogs receive the necessary energy and dietary fiber.
3. How do the two brands compare in terms of ingredient quality?
Both brands pride themselves on using high-quality ingredients. They focus on real meat as the primary protein source, supplemented with fruits, vegetables, and essential vitamins and minerals. While both are commendable, it’s essential to read the ingredient list of the specific formula you’re considering.
4. Have either of these brands been recalled in the past?
Yes, both brands have experienced recalls. Taste of the Wild had a recall in 2012 due to salmonella concerns, while Blue Wilderness faced recalls for issues like elevated beef thyroid hormones and potential vitamin D toxicity. Both brands took corrective measures following these events.
5. Which brand is more affordable?
Price can vary based on the specific formula, bag size, and retailer. Generally speaking, Taste of the Wild tends to be slightly more affordable than Blue Wilderness. However, prices can change, so it’s best to compare the latest prices from trusted retailers.
6. Which brand is more suitable for puppies?
Both brands offer puppy-specific formulas designed to meet the nutritional needs of growing dogs. These formulas typically have higher protein and fat content to support growth. The choice between the two would depend on the specific nutritional needs and preferences of your puppy.
7. Do either of these brands cater to specific dietary needs or health issues?
Yes, both Taste of the Wild and Blue Wilderness offer specialized formulas. Whether your dog has food sensitivities, weight management issues, or specific life stage requirements, both brands have options to cater to these needs.
8. Where are these brands manufactured?
Taste of the Wild is produced in the USA in facilities owned by the parent company, Diamond Pet Foods. Blue Wilderness, under the Blue Buffalo company, also manufactures its products in the USA.
9. Do these brands use real meat as the first ingredient?
Absolutely. Both Taste of the Wild and Blue Wilderness emphasize using real meat, fish, or fowl as the primary ingredients in their formulas, ensuring that dogs receive quality protein sources.
10. How do the two brands fare in terms of customer reviews?
Both brands generally receive positive reviews, with pet owners praising the quality of ingredients, the positive effects on coat and energy levels, and the palatability of their dogs. However, as with any product, some formulas might have mixed reviews based on individual dog preferences and sensitivities.
11. Do these brands offer wet food options?
Yes, both Taste of the Wild and Blue Wilderness offer wet or canned dog food options in addition to their dry kibble varieties. Wet food can be a good choice for dogs that prefer it or need additional moisture in their diet.
12. Are there any controversial ingredients used in either brand?
Both brands aim for high-quality formulations, but there are instances where certain ingredients may raise eyebrows. For instance, Taste of the Wild has used tomato pomace, and Blue Wilderness has incorporated caramel color in some formulas. It’s essential to research and decide what you’re comfortable feeding your pet.
13. How do the two compare in terms of fiber content?
Both brands incorporate fruits, vegetables, and other fiber sources in their formulas to ensure healthy digestion. The exact fiber content can vary between specific formulas, so checking the nutritional information is advised.
14. Which brand offers more options for senior dogs?
Both brands cater to senior dogs with formulas tailored to their unique nutritional needs, which often include joint support and adjusted calorie content. The choice between the two would again boil down to specific formula ingredients and your dog’s preferences.
15. Are there any unique features in either brand that stand out?
Taste of the Wild often includes probiotics for enhanced digestion. Blue Wilderness, on the other hand, features its “LifeSource Bits” – a blend of vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants, in many of its formulas.